Mid-exam revision, Lectures 1 to 3
The exam covers everything up to where lessons ended: Simon’s bounded rationality and the behavioral side of decision making. Read the lecture pages, lock in the mnemonics, then write the essays from memory.
How to use this in the last hours
- Read Lecture 3 fully, then the mnemonics page.
- Do the essay drills without the word bank first. Turn it on only for the blanks you can’t recall.
- Any blank you got wrong: go back to that lecture section and say the point out loud once.
- Finish with the quick quiz.
Long answers score when they follow a pattern: define the concept, explain each part in its own paragraph, give a real example for each part, then compare or evaluate. Every essay drill on this site is written in that pattern, so copying its shape is safe.
Lecture 3: Decision making
The last deck taught before the exam. Expect “compare”, “explain” and “discuss with examples” questions here.
Nature of decision making
Decision making is the act of choosing one alternative from among a set of alternatives. First you decide that a decision has to be made, then you identify a set of feasible alternatives, then you select one.
Some experts see it as the most basic of all managerial activities. It is linked most closely with Planning, but is also part of Organizing, Leading and Controlling.
The decision-making process: recognize and define the decision situation, identify alternatives, choose the best alternative, and put it into practice.
Managers make decisions about problems (undesirable situations, e.g. cutting costs by 10%) and opportunities (desirable situations, e.g. learning that profits are higher than projected). It can take a long time to know whether a decision was right.
Effective decisions may aim to optimize (profits, sales, market share, employee welfare), minimize (losses, expenses, employee turnover), or select the best way out of a business, lay off staff, or end a strategic alliance.
Types of decisions
| Programmed | Nonprogrammed | |
|---|---|---|
| Nature | Fairly structured, recurs frequently (or both) | Unstructured, occurs much less often |
| Who | Operating systems, procedures, standard transactions | Top managers: strategy and organization design |
| Examples | McDonald’s Big Mac made to procedure; Starbucks reordering cups, coffee beans, napkins | Mergers, acquisitions, takeovers, new facilities, new products, labour contracts, legal issues |
| How decided | Rules and procedures | Treated as unique; much time, energy and resources; intuition and experience are major factors |
A Lusaka supermarket that automatically reorders mealie meal when stock falls below 200 bags is making a programmed decision. The same chain deciding whether to open a new branch in Kitwe is nonprogrammed: it happens once, has no rulebook, and depends on judgment.
Decision-making conditions
- Certainty: very few organizational decisions, because the environment is complex and turbulent.
- Risk: based on past experience, relevant information, advice of others and own judgment. The decision is “calculated” on which alternative has the highest probability of working. Examples: union negotiations; Porsche choosing an SUV focus vs high-performance sports cars.
- Uncertainty: managers must secure as much relevant information as possible and approach the situation logically and rationally. Intuition, judgment and experience always play major roles.
Risk: an insurer pricing car cover in Zambia knows from claims history that roughly a certain share of drivers will claim, so it can calculate. Uncertainty: a firm entering Lesotho for the first time has no history to calculate from, so it gathers what it can and relies on judgment.
Classical model vs Administrative model
The Classical Decision Model tells managers how they should make decisions. It assumes managers are logical and rational and that their decisions serve the organization’s best interests. Managers should obtain complete and perfect information, eliminate uncertainty, and evaluate everything rationally and logically. These conditions rarely, if ever, exist.
The Administrative Model, developed by Herbert A. Simon (Nobel Prize in Economics), describes how decisions are actually made. Decision makers have incomplete and imperfect information, are constrained by bounded rationality and tend to satisfice.
| Classical | Administrative (Simon) |
|---|---|
| Prescriptive: how managers should decide | Descriptive: how managers actually decide |
| Complete and perfect information | Incomplete and imperfect information |
| Uncertainty eliminated | Constrained by bounded rationality |
| Rational, logical evaluation; optimize | Satisfice |
| Decision best serves the organization | Decision may or may not serve the organization |
Bounded rationality: decision makers are limited by their values and unconscious reflexes, skills and habits. Slide example: American automakers vs foreign automakers.
Satisficing: the tendency to search for alternatives only until one is found that meets some minimum standard of sufficiency, rather than an exhaustive search for the best possible alternative.
Using both: the Classical model shows how managers can at least attempt to be more rational and logical; the Administrative model helps managers understand their inherent biases and limitations.
A procurement officer needs a reagent supplier this week. Instead of comparing every supplier in SADC, she phones three, and the first one that can deliver on time at an acceptable price in ZMW gets the order. That is satisficing. Her choice of which three to phone is shaped by habit and past relationships: bounded rationality.
Rational decision making: 6 steps
Six steps that keep the decision maker focused on facts and logic and guard against inappropriate assumptions and pitfalls.
- Recognize and define the decision situation. Define precisely what the problem is; develop a complete understanding; carefully analyse the situation.
- Identify alternatives. Alternatives may be limited by legal, moral and ethical norms, authority constraints, available technology, economic considerations and unofficial social norms.
- Evaluate alternatives. Each must pass three stages (FSA below). Put “price tags” on consequences.
- Select an alternative. The real test of decision making. Optimization is the goal because a decision affects several individuals or departments. Several acceptable alternatives may exist; you may not need to reject all others.
- Implement the chosen alternative. Consider people’s resistance to change. Operational plans help. Unanticipated consequences are still likely.
- Follow up and evaluate results. Did it serve its original purpose? If not: adopt another identified alternative, or recognize the situation was wrongly defined and start again, or decide it needs more time or a different implementation.
Goal: raise sales by 50%. Option A, a national TV campaign: feasible and satisfactory, but it would drain the budget for stock, so it fails affordability and is rejected. That last point is the one examiners look for: even a feasible and satisfactory option must be rejected if the consequences are too expensive for the total system.
Behavioral aspects of decision making
Decisions sometimes reflect subjective considerations (tastes). Behavioral forces include political forces, intuition, escalation of commitment, risk propensity and ethics.
- Political forces, coalitions: an informal alliance of individuals or groups formed to achieve a common goal (stockholders, directors, parliament blocs). Impact can be positive or negative. Managers must know when to use them, check they act in the organization’s interest, and control negative effects.
- Intuition: an innate belief about something without conscious consideration; doing something because it “feels right”. Based on years of experience in similar situations; lets managers skip an a-to-z process occasionally.
- Escalation of commitment: staying with a decision even when it appears to be wrong (Pan Am holdings). Guard against sticking too long, but don’t bail out too soon.
- Risk propensity: the extent to which a decision maker is willing to gamble. Organizational culture is a prime ingredient.
- Ethics: relationships of the firm to employees (closing a department to save money), of employees to the firm, and of the firm to other economic agents.
Escalation of commitment: a company has spent ZMW 2 million on a custom system that keeps failing, and management approves another ZMW 500,000 “because we’ve come this far”. Coalition: three board members agree before a meeting to vote together on a merger.
Lecture 2: BI, analytics and decision support
Frameworks and definitions. Names and years matter here: Simon 1977, Anthony 1965, Gorry and Scott-Morton 1971, Gartner mid-1990s.
Business Pressures-Responses-Support model
Companies are moving aggressively to computerized support of their operations (BI). Pressures come from today’s competitive climate; organizations take responses to counter them; computerized support facilitates the responses.
Organizational responses: be reactive, anticipative, adaptive and proactive. Employ strategic planning, new business models, restructure business processes, join business alliances, improve corporate information systems.
Closing the strategy gap: a major objective of computerized decision support is to close the gap between current performance and desired performance (as expressed in mission, objectives, goals and strategy).
Managerial decision making
Management is a process by which organizational goals are achieved using resources. Inputs are resources, output is goal attainment, and success = outputs / inputs. Decision making is selecting the best solution from two or more alternatives.
Mintzberg’s 10 managerial roles (3, 3, 4)
| Interpersonal (3) | Informational (3) | Decisional (4) |
|---|---|---|
| Figurehead Leader Liaison | Monitor Disseminator Spokesperson | Entrepreneur Disturbance handler Resource allocator Negotiator |
Hook: “Funny Lions Laugh, Many Dogs Sing, Every Duck Really Naps”.
Four-step decision process (scientific approach)
- Define the problem (or opportunity).
- Construct a model that describes the real-world problem.
- Identify possible solutions to the modelled problem and evaluate them.
- Compare, choose and recommend a potential solution.
How IS supports decisions: group communication and collaboration, improved data management, managing data warehouses and Big Data, analytical support, overcoming cognitive limits in processing and storing information, knowledge management, anywhere anytime support.
Gorry and Scott-Morton framework (1971)
A grid of two dimensions:
- Degree of structuredness (Simon, 1977): highly structured (programmed), semi-structured, highly unstructured (nonprogrammed).
- Types of control (Anthony, 1965): strategic planning (top level, long range), management control (tactical planning), operational control.
Hook: “Simon Structures, Anthony Controls.”
Programmed decisions from Lecture 3 are Simon’s structured decisions and usually sit at operational control. Nonprogrammed decisions are unstructured and usually sit at strategic planning. Making this connection in an essay shows you understand the whole course, not just one lecture.
DSS and BI
DSS (Gorry and Scott-Morton, 1971): interactive computer-based systems that help decision makers use data and models to solve unstructured problems. DSS couple the intellectual resources of individuals with the capabilities of the computer to improve decision quality. DS became an umbrella term and evolved into BI.
BI is an evolution of decision support. Then: Executive Information System. Now: “Everybody’s Information System”. BI adds visualizations, alerts and performance measurement. The term emerged from industry.
Definition: BI is an umbrella term combining architectures, tools, databases, analytical tools, applications and methodologies. It is a content-free expression (means different things to different people). Major objective: easy access to data and models so managers can analyse. BI transforms data to information (and knowledge), to decisions, and finally to action.
History of BI
BI architecture: four components
Business value of BI applications: customer segmentation, propensity to buy, customer profitability, fraud detection, customer attrition, channel optimization.
DSS vs BI
| Similar | Different |
|---|---|
| Similar architectures; data focus | DSS gives direct support, BI often indirect; different target audiences; BI usually commercial systems vs DSS in-house development; DSS originated in academia, BI in industry |
Analytics taxonomy (INFORMS): descriptive, predictive, prescriptive.
Sabre helps clients through dashboards and analytics. Traditional reporting is static, periodic reports of what happened. Analytics transforms it into interactive reporting where users drill down and explore, which supports faster decisions.
Lecture 1: Course overview
Definitions and lists. Learn the four analytics questions word for word.
BI and BA
BI is a broad category of applications, technologies and processes for gathering, sorting, accessing and analysing data to help business users make better decisions.
BA is iterative, methodical exploration of organizational data with emphasis on statistical analysis to drive decision making.
BI focuses on descriptive analytics; BA extends to predictive and prescriptive. Applications: performance management, CRM, supply chain (inventory), risk management (fraud detection), strategic planning (market expansion).
Descriptive: December sales were ZMW 4.2 million. Diagnostic: they rose because of school holidays and a promotion. Predictive: next December is likely to reach ZMW 4.6 million. Prescriptive: stock 15% more beverages and run the promotion two weeks earlier.
Value of BI and analytics
- Operational efficiency: find bottlenecks (manufacturing yield).
- Customer experience: personalized marketing (targeted recommendations).
- New revenue: market trends (new product development).
- Risk mitigation: detect anomalies (credit risk assessment).
- Strategic decisions: comprehensive view (market share analysis).
- Real-time monitoring (supply chain disruptions).
Components of BI systems
Data sources and management
- Internal: transactional systems, operational databases, ERP. External: market research, social media, public datasets, third-party providers.
- ETL: extract from sources, transform to fit needs, load into warehouse.
- Data quality management: accuracy, completeness, consistency via cleansing and validation.
- Master data management: single authoritative version of critical data (customers, product catalogs).
Storage and processing
- Data warehouse: centralized repository of integrated data, optimized for querying and analysis.
- Data mart: subject-specific subset of a warehouse (sales, finance).
- OLAP: multidimensional analysis (sales by region, product and time).
- In-memory databases: data in main memory for real-time analytics.
- Big data technologies: Hadoop, Spark for structured and unstructured data.
Analytics and visualization tools
BI platforms, data mining tools, advanced analytics (predictive modelling, ML), self-service BI (non-technical users without IT), mobile BI.
Data warehousing process
Collect, clean, integrate, design schema (star, snowflake), implement ETL, maintain (updates, tuning, capacity planning). Hook: “Clever Children Invent Super Easy Machines”.
Data mining techniques
| Technique | What it does | Example |
|---|---|---|
| Classification | Categorize into predefined classes | Spam detection, customer segmentation |
| Clustering | Group similar data, no predefined categories | Market segmentation, anomaly detection |
| Association rules | Relationships between variables | Market basket analysis, recommendations |
| Regression | Predict continuous values | Sales forecasting, price optimization |
| Time series | Trends over time | Demand forecasting, stock prices |
| Text mining | Meaning from unstructured text | Sentiment analysis, topic modelling |
Visualization strategies
Chart selection (bar for comparisons, line for trends), colour schemes, interactive elements (drill-down, filters, tooltips), storytelling, design principles (clarity, whitespace, consistency), customization for audiences (executive vs analyst).
BI problem-solving approach
Problem definition, data collection and preparation, exploratory data analysis, advanced analytics, results interpretation, implementation and monitoring.
Real-world applications: sales optimization (dynamic pricing), churn prevention, supply chain optimization, fraud detection, marketing effectiveness (A/B testing), HR analytics (turnover).
Star schema vs snowflake schema
From the data warehouse design slides and the data modelling reading. Both are dimensional models; the difference is whether dimension tables are normalized.
The building blocks
The lecture slide: a star schema is a design particularly suited to ad hoc queries, in which dimensional data are separated from fact data. It has two types of tables: dimension tables and fact tables.
| Fact table | Dimension table |
|---|---|
| At the centre | Around the fact table |
| Numerical measurements or metrics (quantity, sales amount) | Descriptive attributes giving context (product name, store city, date, customer) |
| Foreign keys pointing to each dimension | Primary key matched by the fact table |
| Many rows, grows fast | Fewer rows |
Relationship: each dimension table is linked to the fact table one-to-many (one product appears in many sales rows). On the slide this shows as 1 at the dimension and m at the fact table.
Hook: Facts are numbers you add up; dimensions are words you filter and group by.
Star schema
Each dimension holds all its attributes in one denormalized table. Product name, category and department all sit in Dim_Product, so “Beverages” is repeated on every beverage product row. Every dimension is one join away from the fact table.
Snowflake schema
A snowflake schema extends the star schema by normalizing dimension tables into multiple levels of related tables. Category and department move into their own tables, so “Beverages” is stored once. The diagram branches outward like a snowflake. Reaching category now needs an extra join.
Side-by-side comparison
| Feature | Star schema | Snowflake schema |
|---|---|---|
| Dimension tables | Denormalized, one table per dimension | Normalized into sub-dimension tables |
| Joins per query | Fewer (one per dimension) | More (dimension plus its sub-tables) |
| Query speed | Usually faster | Usually slower |
| Ease for business users | Simpler to understand and query | More complex |
| Redundancy | Higher (attributes repeated) | Lower |
| Storage | More | Less |
| Data integrity and maintenance | Update anomalies possible (change a category name in many rows) | Easier: change it once |
| Fact table | Central, measures plus foreign keys | Same: central, measures plus foreign keys |
| Best when | Query performance and simplicity matter most; ad hoc BI dashboards | Large dimensions with deep hierarchies; storage and integrity matter more |
Same question, two schemas (SQL)
Question: total sales in ZMW by product category.
Star: one join
SELECT p.category,
SUM(f.amount_zmw) AS total_sales
FROM fact_sales f
JOIN dim_product p ON f.product_key = p.product_key
GROUP BY p.category;
Snowflake: two joins
SELECT c.category_name,
SUM(f.amount_zmw) AS total_sales
FROM fact_sales f
JOIN dim_product p ON f.product_key = p.product_key
JOIN dim_category c ON p.category_key = c.category_key
GROUP BY c.category_name;
In Power BI, a star schema is the recommended shape: one fact table with slicers coming from flat dimension tables. If you import a snowflake, Power BI still works, but the extra relationships make the model harder to read, and analysts often merge the sub-tables back into one dimension in Power Query. That is literally turning a snowflake back into a star.
Related term worth one line in an essay: a galaxy schema (fact constellation) has several fact tables sharing the same dimension tables.
All mnemonics
Cover the right-hand side and recite. If you can expand every hook, you can write every essay.
| Hook | Expands to | Lecture |
|---|---|---|
| C R U “Can’t Really Understand” | Certainty, Risk, Uncertainty (ambiguity rising) | 3 |
| I B S | Simon’s Administrative model: Incomplete information, Bounded rationality, Satisficing | 3 |
| Real Investors Evaluate Shares In Fiji | Recognize/define, Identify alternatives, Evaluate, Select, Implement, Follow up | 3 |
| F S A | Feasibility, Satisfactory, Affordability | 3 |
| PIERE | Political forces (coalitions), Intuition, Escalation of commitment, Risk propensity, Ethics | 3 |
| Prescribes vs Describes | Classical prescribes (should); Administrative describes (actually) | 3 |
| M C T S “My Cousin Teaches Science” | Markets, Consumer demand, Technology, Societal | 2 |
| 3, 3, 4 “Funny Lions Laugh, Many Dogs Sing, Every Duck Really Naps” | Figurehead, Leader, Liaison; Monitor, Disseminator, Spokesperson; Entrepreneur, Disturbance handler, Resource allocator, Negotiator | 2 |
| Simon Structures, Anthony Controls | Gorry and Scott-Morton (1971): structuredness (Simon 1977) × type of control (Anthony 1965) | 2 |
| My Eagle Owns Africa | 1970s MIS, 1980s EIS, 1990s OLAP (BI coined by Gartner), 2010s AI and mining | 2 |
| Data Builds Better UIs | Data warehouse, Business analytics, BPM, User interface | 2 |
| Doctors Diagnose, Predict, Prescribe | Descriptive, Diagnostic, Predictive, Prescriptive | 1 |
| Clever Children Invent Super Easy Machines | Collect, Clean, Integrate, Schema design, ETL, Maintain | 1 |
| Classification Comes with labels, Clustering Creates them | Supervised vs unsupervised | 1 |
| FAST | Star: Fewer joins, All attributes in one table, Simple and speedy, Takes more space | DW |
| SNOW | Snowflake: Split dimensions, Normalized, Organized hierarchies, Worse query speed | DW |
| Numbers vs words | Facts are numbers you add up; dimensions are words you filter and group by | DW |
Essay drills
Each drill is a full model answer with key terms removed. Type the missing word, then check. Your answers are saved in this browser.
Quick quiz
Pick an answer to see whether it is right and why.